<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Age of Grand Canyon a Bush secret</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cobbers.com/age-of-grand-canyon-a-bush-secret/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cobbers.com/age-of-grand-canyon-a-bush-secret/</link>
	<description>Mates on a mission</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 14:18:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Small</title>
		<link>http://cobbers.com/age-of-grand-canyon-a-bush-secret/comment-page-1/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Small</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cobbers.com/?p=167#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Sorry Doonesbury fans, but there never was a directive from the Bush administration that probibits National Park Service employees from  discussing the geologic age of the Grand Canyon.  This is just a bit of leftist propaganda originated by a group that calls itself Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility with no evidence or substantiation presented.

If you check the National Park Service web site for the Grand Canyon, you&#039;ll see all sorts of scientific data about this scenic wonder--and not a single mention about biblical dates.

Further, if such a directive did exist you would read about it on the front page of the New York Times and not learn about it through some obscure web site or e-mail chain letter or a comic strip.

If you fell for this bit of nonsense, you are either incredibly naive or so full of hate that you can ignore your critical thinking faculties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Doonesbury fans, but there never was a directive from the Bush administration that probibits National Park Service employees from  discussing the geologic age of the Grand Canyon.  This is just a bit of leftist propaganda originated by a group that calls itself Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility with no evidence or substantiation presented.</p>
<p>If you check the National Park Service web site for the Grand Canyon, you&#8217;ll see all sorts of scientific data about this scenic wonder&#8211;and not a single mention about biblical dates.</p>
<p>Further, if such a directive did exist you would read about it on the front page of the New York Times and not learn about it through some obscure web site or e-mail chain letter or a comic strip.</p>
<p>If you fell for this bit of nonsense, you are either incredibly naive or so full of hate that you can ignore your critical thinking faculties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranger X</title>
		<link>http://cobbers.com/age-of-grand-canyon-a-bush-secret/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranger X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cobbers.com/?p=167#comment-117</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of problems with this story. My investigation turned up a lot. Don&#039;t believe everything you read.

http://parkrangerx.blogspot.com/2007/01/dont-believe-everything-you-read.html

GRC sells books, not the NPS. GRC is a private, non-profit group. They also sell American Indian books with creation myths. The book in question is in the &quot;inspirational&quot; section. Most of PEER&#039;s claims are wildly unsubstantiated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of problems with this story. My investigation turned up a lot. Don&#8217;t believe everything you read.</p>
<p><a href="http://parkrangerx.blogspot.com/2007/01/dont-believe-everything-you-read.html" rel="nofollow">http://parkrangerx.blogspot.com/2007/01/dont-believe-everything-you-read.html</a></p>
<p>GRC sells books, not the NPS. GRC is a private, non-profit group. They also sell American Indian books with creation myths. The book in question is in the &#8220;inspirational&#8221; section. Most of PEER&#8217;s claims are wildly unsubstantiated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Shelley &#187; Skeptical Calendars</title>
		<link>http://cobbers.com/age-of-grand-canyon-a-bush-secret/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Shelley &#187; Skeptical Calendars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cobbers.com/?p=167#comment-116</guid>
		<description>[...] But can one fund critical thinking? What can one do with a scholarship for &#039;critical&#039; thinking? It doesn&#039;t imply an education fund, because as we all know, there&#039;s no guarantee of any thinking happening in education. A person could use the money to go to the Grand Canyon, buy up all the books that state the Grand Canyon is the result of the Noah&#039;s Arc flood, and tastefully turn such into organic compost, but what would be accomplished? Silliness is like water, and it always flows back into the void when reason passes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But can one fund critical thinking? What can one do with a scholarship for &#39;critical&#39; thinking? It doesn&#39;t imply an education fund, because as we all know, there&#39;s no guarantee of any thinking happening in education. A person could use the money to go to the Grand Canyon, buy up all the books that state the Grand Canyon is the result of the Noah&#39;s Arc flood, and tastefully turn such into organic compost, but what would be accomplished? Silliness is like water, and it always flows back into the void when reason passes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

